Skip to Content
Celebrating Canada's 2SLGBTQI+ Communities
Judge Rules Trans Americans Can Get Gender-Accurate Passports

Judge Rules Trans Americans Can Get Gender-Accurate Passports

A federal judge just blocked Trump’s passport policy. Trans Americans can now get passports that reflect their gender identity…

For trans people in America, even the most basic documents can become battlegrounds. Birth certificates, driver’s licenses, passports — the paper trails that affirm our identity can also be used to erase it. That’s what made Tuesday’s federal ruling in Boston feel like more than just a policy update. It felt like relief.

U.S. District Judge Julia Kobick ruled that transgender and intersex people can obtain passports that reflect their gender identity, halting the enforcement of a Trump-era policy that required all passport gender markers to match an individual’s assigned sex at birth. It’s a significant rebuke to an executive order signed by Donald Trump on his first day back in office — one that aggressively framed gender diversity as a threat to biological “truth.”

Let’s be clear: this wasn’t about paperwork. It was about erasure.

What the Court Actually Ruled

The ruling isn’t final — yet — but it sends a powerful message. In issuing a preliminary injunction, Judge Kobick expanded on an earlier decision from April that protected six individual plaintiffs. Now, the protection extends to alltrans people in the U.S. who are currently without a valid passport, or need a new one due to expiration, loss, or changes in name or gender.

The Trump administration had argued the policy didn’t violate equal protection under the Constitution. Judge Kobick disagreed.

“The Executive Order and the Passport Policy on their face classify passport applicants on the basis of sex,” she wrote, which means the policy must meet intermediate judicial scrutiny — a legal standard requiring the government to prove that a discriminatory law is substantially related to an important interest. According to Kobick, they failed to do so.

Translation: there was no justifiable reason to deny someone a passport that aligns with who they actually are.

When a Passport Isn’t Just a Passport

For most people, a passport is a travel document. For trans people, it’s often a life-or-death safety measure. The fear of harassment — or worse — at airport security checkpoints is real. Being outed by a mismatched gender marker can turn a routine trip into a traumatic or dangerous encounter.

Just ask RuPaul’s Drag Race All Stars 10 cast member Aja. In May, she revealed on Instagram that her new passport came back marked “M” — even though her previous passport, legal documents, and submitted materials all identified her as female. She hadn’t requested a change. She was simply replacing a lost passport.

“When I said that having a document with incorrect information puts me in danger traveling internationally, I was denied escalation,” she wrote. “Now I’m being forced to choose between my safety and my career.”

Aja called it what it was: “a federal fumble with my life in the crosshairs.”

She’s not alone.

Earlier this year, Euphoria star Hunter Schafer spoke out about the freezing of her own passport application. In a widely shared video, she explained how the administration’s executive order had halted gender marker changes altogether — effectively forcing trans people into a legal deadzone.

The Politics of Visibility and Erasure

The Trump administration’s policy wasn’t just bureaucratic cruelty — it was political messaging wrapped in administrative language. His executive order, chillingly titled “Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government,” was a thinly veiled attack on trans existence.

It wasn’t just about M, F, or X. It was about pushing the false narrative that trans people are a threat to societal norms — an ideology that weaponizes gender identity for culture war clout.

This ruling interrupts that narrative. It doesn’t just protect rights — it affirms reality.

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), which brought the lawsuit, acknowledged the progress but emphasized that the fight isn’t over. “While this is good news,” they wrote in a statement, “we will continue fighting until this executive order is blocked permanently.”

What Happens Next?

The court’s decision is a preliminary injunction — meaning the legal battle continues. But it’s a crucial early win. Until the broader case is resolved, trans Americans can breathe a little easier knowing their passports, for now, can reflect their actual identities.

It’s not the end of the fight — but it is a moment worth holding onto.

Because for many trans people, this ruling isn’t just about travel. It’s about dignity. It’s about safety. It’s about having the government acknowledge, even temporarily, that who they are isn’t up for debate.

Related Articles

July 15, 2025 / Latest Life

Inside The BC Organization Transforming Queer and Trans Health

Health Initiative for Men (HIM) is a non-profit society that aims to strengthen health and well-being in communities of self-identified gay, bisexual and queer men and gender-diverse people in BC

July 14, 2025 / Latest Life

Ottawa Art Gallery’s New Art Fund Honours Collector Bill Staubi

The gallery’s new fund will continue Staubi’s work of uplifting and supporting emerging queer artists

July 14, 2025 / Latest Life

What Can The “T” Learn From The “LGB” When It Comes To Fighting The Good Fight?

What is going on with trans rights and social acceptance, and what can activists learn from the LGB liberation fight to turn things around?

POST A COMMENT

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *