Home / Entertainment  / Femmes On Film

Femmes On Film

Unpacking the lack of genuine LGBT diversity in mainstream media…
 
Representation of gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender characters in mainstream media is currently at an all-time high, and is light years ahead of where it started in the 1970s. Shows like Orange is the New Black and Modern Family have brought LGBT stories and issues into the living rooms of millions, and opened our eyes to how much representation of the LGBT community matters in a modern society. But while we’ve come a long way, there is still a hard road ahead before queer characters are front and centre, and represented fairly in mainstream media.
 
It’s hard to believe that it wasn’t until the 1970s that queer characters first made their way onto mainstream television programs. Even then, the characters only got single-episode story arcs, and were usually forgotten about by the time the next episode aired a week later. And though these characters from 40 years ago made waves, the shows they starred in still included homophobic jokes and storylines. Often, the queer characters these shows chose to include were so blatantly stereotypical they started to seem hypocritical. As much as we want to believe we’ve made great strides in portraying the LGBT community in pop culture, this continues to be a problem with portraying queer characters on modern television. Just because a show includes a queer character doesn’t mean their show is progressive, and entertaining for queer audiences.
 
The 1990s saw the popular sitcom Friends include queer characters through its entire 10-year run. Whether it was Ross’s lesbian ex-wife or Chandler’s drag-queen father, the show does get some credit for its inclusion of the LGBT community. But what seemed edgy and progressive at the time does get cringe-worthy upon re-watching the series now. Even though featuring a whole episode on a lesbian wedding was a big deal at the time, the same episode also includes a string of homophobic jokes. Ross’s ex-wife and Chandler’s father were often the punchline for jokes and storylines. The show’s writers still defend their creative choices, stating that the show was incredibly progressive for its time, despite the fact that audiences agree that it hasn’t aged well.
 
Then came shows like Will & Grace and Queer as Folk and, for the first time, it felt like audiences were seeing queer characters who drove a storyline and carried a show. Both of these shows were part of a huge turning point for depicting queer culture on prime-time television.
 
Unfortunately, we’re still seeing queer characters and storylines randomly thrown into shows as the token LGBT representation, and it’s just not good enough.
 
Yes, there is more representation of queer individuals in mainstream media. But imagine if, instead of just being token characters, they were regular, multifaceted beings, and their sexuality and gender identity didn’t exclusively define who they were. What if they weren’t just the femme gay best friends, there to assist the pretty blonde girl with her outfits?
 
There are still plenty of shows and movies that throw in token queer characters in order to appear relevant and progressive. The problem is that, often, these token characters seem to fall into stereotypes we all know so well…because those same stereotypes (specifically of femme gay men and butch lesbian women) were once the only way we saw queer people represented on screen. What we really need to see, now more than ever, is an accurate representation of queer people in media. We need to see more bisexuals, pansexuals and asexuals. We need more transgender characters and stories.
 
With the popularity of online streaming, shows started taking more risks with what they were showing, without the pressure of major networks controlling what they could, and could not, talk about on their shows. With the “streaming revolution,” we did start to see more representation of trans characters, played by trans actors like Laverne Cox in Orange is the New Black. Netflix’s recent reboot of Sabrina the Teenage Witch features a non-binary character, played by a non-binary actor. [Pictured above: Netflix’s The Chilling Adventures of Sabrina features a non-binary character named Susie Putnam, portrayed by Lachlan Watson, a non-binary actor]
 
As more of the LGBT community is fairly represented in popular mainstream media, we gain a better understanding of each other. We become one step closer to living in a world that with time becomes more accepting. Take, for example, the recent surge in mainstream popularity of RuPaul’s Drag Race. A more diverse group of people is being fully immersed in drag culture, and getting excited and involved in the wonderful and colourful world of drag. They’re going to drag bars, and supporting their local queens. Some may say that without RuPaul’s accessible gateway to drag, it would remain a clandestine subculture, observed solely by those in the LGBT community.
 
Despite what various bigoted and irrelevant people seem to say on social media, there can never be enough diversity: not with race, gender, sexuality or otherwise. There is always room for more people to be fairly represented in mainstream media. What we are consuming in popular culture needs to catch up so it can resemble the kind of world we are currently living in.
 
There are a select number of shows that have honestly and genuinely portrayed multifaceted LGBT characters without relying on stereotypes. We need to continue demanding more representation like this of the LGBT community in popular culture. After all, there can always be more, and better, representation – we have to continue demanding and supporting it. If we do, the landscape of LGBT representation in mainstream media will look very different, and the world will be a little bit better because of it.
 

 
BIANCA GUZZO is a writer based out of the GTA. She spends her free time watching Trixie Mattel makeup tutorials, though she still has yet to nail the look.
 

2 COMMENTS
  • Ashley January 3, 2019

    Funny that this author refers to shows from the early 1990s and 2000s seeing as this article reads like it was written in 2005. Representation will always be an issue no matter how many strides are made in the industry. Framing an entire commentary on the need for greater representation is a moot point in the same way making a statement such as “there needs to be greater medical advancement in the future” would be unimaginatively redundant.

    A more interesting article would have discussed the complicated factors surrounding queer representation. That representation does not exist in a bubble and needs to address other spheres such as socioeconomic status, race, culture, gender (the list goes on) and the politics/oppression surrounding those very spheres. Why intersectionality was not the primary focus of this article is beyond me and makes for very tired and outdated journalism.

    Maybe the more pertinent issue is queer representation within the media infrastructure/industry itself. IN Magazine should allocate more space for queer writers to discuss pressing issues rather than this endless slog of contrived posts from Drag Race fans.

    • admin2 January 5, 2019

      Hi Ashley ~
      Thanks for your feedback! We’re always looking for writers with new voices, ideas and opinions to share with our readers. Sure, we definitely do Drag Race coverage… but, we also cover off politics, pop culture, social commentary, opinion pieces and more. If you’d ever like to pitch us we’d love to hear from you!
      Happy New Year!
      IN

POST A COMMENT

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.